Rendered from docs/scoreboard/agno-agi/agno.md — the
Markdown in the repo is the source of truth; this page is generated by
scripts/build_incident_pages.py, never hand-edited.
How AI built agno-agi/agno
Every one of the 103 AI commits here that made a checkable claim did what it said — each claim backed by the commit's own diff. The check: an AI agent's commit message is just text it wrote — the diff is what git recorded. This page reports, for the AI-authored commits, whether each concrete claim in a message ("fix X", "add tests for Y") is backed by that commit's own diff. A message-vs-diff mismatch is never a correctness, honesty, or intent grade — only a note that a commit's words and its own diff disagree. Schema and the precise definition: docs/311.
How AI built this
AI agents wrote 3% of the last 5,697 commits here — 168 agent-authored commits. The agents behind them: claude 159 · copilot 7 · aider 1 · devin 1.
Of those, 103 made a concrete claim you can check ("fix X", "add tests for Y") — and every one was backed by the commit's own diff. No commit claimed work its diff doesn't show.
What a mismatch would have looked like (this repo had none)
would flag:
fix: handle null user→ touched 0 files
would flag:test: all green→ deleted test lines, added none
Neither happened here. Every "fix / add / remove" commit touched a real source file; every "tests" commit touched a real test file. That's what a clean page means — not "nothing happened", but every checkable claim backed by the diff.
As of
| Audited range | 792c6ed9428a296b3fa0b62c628e1acc648187c9 → 5cf1ed7f943ff78a2ed0c3c5c14a3bc7fb689e85 |
| Commits in range | 168 (168 attributed commits audited) |
| Rendered | 2026-06-15 |
| Auditor | dos-kernel 0.26.0 |
| Tier | seeded |
| Attribution | agent-attributed commits only (the closed marker set, docs/scoreboard/methodology.md §3); a human commit is never audited here |
The verdict
| Commits | Checkable | Backed by the diff | Claimed, not shown (raw) | Skipped | Raw rate | Final grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168 | 103 | 103 | 0 | 65 | 0.0% | 0 of 103 (0.0%) |
By kind of claim
| Kind of claim | Backed by the diff | Claimed, not shown | Skipped |
|---|---|---|---|
fix / add / remove (code) |
95 | 0 | 0 |
tests |
2 | 0 | 0 |
docs |
6 | 0 | 0 |
| no checkable claim (skipped) | — | — | 65 |
The receipts — every flag, adjudicated
No flags in range.
Reproduce it
git clone https://github.com/agno-agi/agno.git && cd agno
git checkout 5cf1ed7f943ff78a2ed0c3c5c14a3bc7fb689e85
pip install dos-kernel
dos commit-audit --sweep --json --workspace . \
792c6ed9428a296b3fa0b62c628e1acc648187c9..5cf1ed7f943ff78a2ed0c3c5c14a3bc7fb689e85
A newer auditor over the same pinned range may count differently as fire-narrowing continues (each narrowing is a public issue, e.g. #79/#81); the as-of block above is what this page graded, with what.
Corrections
A contested flag gets re-adjudicated and the page re-rendered (the
docs/311 §3 path). Until the
scoreboard-correction template ships (docs/311 P4), open a plain issue
naming this page and the SHA. Methodology — what the witness reads, what it
abstains on, where it has been wrong:
docs/scoreboard/methodology.md.