Skip to the content.

Product status — durable, real, useful-today

fak’s product-status page is a tree-checked snapshot of which of fak’s concepts a person can actually pick up and run today, versus which are still real-but-not-yet-a-surface subsystems or named gaps. As of v0.34.0 it counts 11 durable products you can run offline on a laptop this afternoon, 13 more usable today (benchmarks and proofs you run to see a result, plus the few needing a GPU, key, or network), and 21 witnessed subsystems that work but have no command a person runs directly. Every verdict is re-derived from tools/product_scorecard.data/ by tools/product_scorecard.py and cross-checked against the real tree, so nothing here is hand-typed. The 100/100 score grades how complete and honest that product map is — not how much fak wins — so a labeled honest stub counts as accurate, and only an overclaim counts as a defect.

As of 2026-06-25 (fak v0.34.0). This page answers the one question a person asks of a project: of the concepts fak ships, which can I pick up and use this afternoon — and which are still a research seam or a named gap? Every number and verdict here is re-derived from tools/product_scorecard.data/ by tools/product_scorecard.py and cross-checked against the real tree (the CLAIMS tag a concept carries, whether its first command resolves, whether its witness and entry docs exist). Nothing on this page is hand-typed; regenerate it with the commands at the bottom.

Headline

Metric Value
Durable products you can run on a laptop today 11
Usable today (a benchmark/proof you run to see a result, or needs a GPU / key / network) 13
Real subsystems, not yet a person-facing surface 21
Coverage of the concept catalog 100% (28/28 CLAIMS.md concept sections positioned)
Product-debt (honesty + coverage defects) 0
Composite map score 100/100 (grade A)

Read this right. The score grades how complete and honest the product map is, not how much fak wins. An honest real-not-easy subsystem or a labeled honest-stub is not a defect; an overclaimed verdict is. The 17 real-but-not-yet-a-surface concepts are exactly where the next product gains come from — see What’s next.

Standing at a glance

product standing chart — 45 concepts · score 100.0/100 (grade A) · product-debt 0

verdict ladder (count of concepts, best -> roadmap):
  ★ durable-product ███████████████············· 11
  ● usable-today    █████████████████··········· 13
  ◐ real-not-easy   ████████████████████████████ 21
  ○ honest-stub     ···························· 0
  · concept-only    ···························· 0

verdict mix by category (each cell = one concept):
  memory       ★◐◐◐             (4 concept(s); 1 durable, 0 usable-today)
  model        ★●◐◐◐◐◐◐◐        (9 concept(s); 1 durable, 1 usable-today)
  performance  ●●●●●●●◐◐◐◐      (11 concept(s); 0 durable, 7 usable-today)
  platform     ★★●●●●●          (7 concept(s); 2 durable, 5 usable-today)
  security     ★★★◐◐◐           (6 concept(s); 3 durable, 0 usable-today)
  tooling      ★★★★◐◐◐◐         (8 concept(s); 4 durable, 0 usable-today)

can a person run it today?
  laptop (offline)   ██████████████·············· 22
  needs gpu/key/net  █··························· 2
  no direct command  █████████████··············· 21

coverage  [████████████████████████████████] 100.0%  (28/28 concept sections positioned)

legend: ★ durable-product   ● usable-today   ◐ real-not-easy   ○ honest-stub   · concept-only

The biggest bar is real-not-easy (21): real, witnessed subsystems with no surface a person runs directly. tooling and security carry the most durable products; the model lane is almost entirely subsystem-deep (the kernel-owned KV cache, the quarantine bridge, the parity lanes) — proven in tests, not yet wired into a live run.

What you can run today (11 durable products)

Each ships, has an offline first command (no GPU, no key), a witness that exists, and an entry doc — usable on a laptop this afternoon.

Another 13 are usable today but need a GPU, an API key, a network, or are a benchmark you run to see a result (the governed gateway fak serve, the Claude Code passthrough, the fan-out / turn-tax / long-context benchmarks, fak ablate, the fak vcache prove* proofs, fak task sample, the a2ademo channel proof, the RSI ship-gate, and the persistent context planner).

What’s real but not yet a product surface (21)

These are the witnessed subsystems behind the headline guarantees — bit-exact KV eviction, the cross-engine co-residence seam, RadixAttention parity, the normalize-and- rescan admission driver, information-flow control. They are real and proven, but a person can’t run them directly yet; they live inside the agent / serve path or behind a build tag. Turning the highest-value ones into surfaces is the next frontier.

What’s next

The product-scorecard pass surfaced four next steps that aren’t already tracked. Each is filed; #582, #581, and #580 are resolved (see Resolved below), leaving one open:

Resolved

Regenerate / verify

python tools/product_scorecard.py                 # the full human scorecard
python tools/product_scorecard.py --chart         # the at-a-glance chart above
python tools/product_scorecard.py --json          # machine payload
python tools/product_scorecard.py --markdown-dir docs/product-scorecard   # the generated scorecard