Skip to the content.

S8f: non-fixture corpus and independent grader

Verdict

A real 1,000-issue GitHub snapshot now replaces generated benchmark records for the next falsification stages. Candidate pipelines receive the authentic source payload: title, body, state, labels, timestamps, closure time, URL, issue number, and a deterministic train | tune | test assignment. Derived relation targets, cue facts, and aggregate gold outputs live in a separately hashed answer bundle consumed by the grader. Keeping source metadata visible is essential for a fair SQL/search baseline; hiding it would turn an exact query into an artificial prediction task.

This is a corpus/grader witness, not a model-quality or performance result. It does not establish that micro-context execution wins; it makes that claim falsifiable on held-out real records.

Artifacts:

Captured corpus

Property Witness
Real public issues 1,000
Train / tune / held-out test 212 / 108 / 680
Open / closed 380 / 620
Parsed issue-reference edges 2,037
Explicit duplicate edges 12
Contradiction/conflict cue facts 102
Public-scrub affected records / matches 8 / 30
Public corpus SHA-256 0740c911815eba7e44c63a14e021f418b66e8a42556d40f14b8b4cd58f173827
Answer bundle SHA-256 af827ddca1063c602153f80b14523bda8d07e1a7e909a5c487616f2702eda05d

Exact duplicate-title/body records and all records connected by in-corpus issue references are first grouped into components. Each component is assigned by SHA-256(minimum issue number) mod 10: two buckets train, two tune, six held-out test. This prevents direct duplicates and linked issue neighborhoods from straddling tune/test. Assignment occurs before tuning and is independent of source ordering.

Answer contract

The grader covers:

  1. held-out state and label facts;
  2. issue references and explicit duplicate targets;
  3. contradiction/conflict cue detection (lexical cues, not adjudicated semantic contradiction);
  4. exhaustive state and label counts;
  5. newest top-10 and most-recently-updated top-10;
  6. exact record citations and corpus-digest binding.

A candidate submission carries the public corpus digest, one typed answer per record, and aggregate answers. The grader compares only held-out per-record facts, compares exhaustive aggregates, rejects unknown/duplicate IDs, and reports false-positive facts, false-negative facts, aggregate errors, and citation errors. Quality passes only when all are zero.

The built-in blind-oracle selfcheck passed all 680 held-out records with zero errors. That validates the grader wiring; it is not a candidate score.

Leakage controls

The artifact verifier proves:

Operationally, a benchmark runner must mount/pass only the public corpus to candidate pipelines and keep the answer path in the grader process. The files are both committed for reproducibility, so this is evaluation-process isolation, not cryptographic secrecy from a malicious process with repository read access. A future competition-grade run should place held-out answers in a separately permissioned service or release them only after evaluation.

Reproduce and verify

Source acquisition used the public GitHub CLI/API:

gh issue list --state all --limit 1000 \
  --json number,title,body,state,labels,createdAt,updatedAt,closedAt,url \
  > /tmp/fak-issues-1000.json

go run ./cmd/microcontextdemo \
  -corpus-input /tmp/fak-issues-1000.json \
  -corpus-public-output experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-public-2026-08-09.json \
  -corpus-answers-output experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-answers-2026-08-09.json \
  -corpus-report-output experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-report-2026-08-09.json \
  -corpus-source 'github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak/issues?state=all&limit=1000'

The live query is provenance, not a byte-stable replay after issues are edited. The committed public snapshot and its digest are the immutable benchmark input. Verify that snapshot and its paired answers/report with:

go run ./cmd/microcontextdemo \
  -verify-corpus-public experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-public-2026-08-09.json \
  -verify-corpus-answers experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-answers-2026-08-09.json \
  -verify-corpus-report experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-report-2026-08-09.json

Grade a candidate without exposing answers to the candidate invocation:

go run ./cmd/microcontextdemo \
  -grade-corpus-answers experiments/microcontext/s8f-github-issues-answers-2026-08-09.json \
  -grade-corpus-submission /tmp/candidate-submission.json \
  -grade-corpus-output /tmp/candidate-grade.json

Limits and next use

#6109 can now tune SQL/search, retrieval/rerank, long-context, and chunk configurations on train/tune without inspecting the 680 held-out answers. #6110 then runs live endpoints; #6111 computes the net-true decision boundary.